How Our Peer Review Works
1) Define the decision and success criteria
We start by clarifying the goal, constraints, and what “good” looks like (cost, schedule, reliability, production, ESG, etc.).
2) Review inputs, assumptions, and field realities
We evaluate technical basis, operational readiness, and execution risks—including vendor dependencies and system limitations.
3) Identify gaps, risks, and improvement opportunities
We highlight what’s working, what’s missing, and what creates the most leverage for improvement.
4) Deliver clear recommendations your team can act on
You receive prioritized findings with practical next steps, and we can support implementation if desired.
Deliverables You Can Expect
-
Priority findings and risk register (what matters most and why)
-
Assumption checks and sensitivity drivers
-
Program optimization recommendations (technical + operational)
-
Vendor / technology comparisons (when applicable)
-
Executive-ready summary for management / partners
Why NTG Auburn
NTG Auburn combines hands-on upstream operations experience with technical rigor—so peer review conclusions are grounded in how projects are executed in the real world, not just how they look on paper.